As I discussed in the previous post, this series
will attempt to make a case for Multi Function Printer (MFP) and other office product dealers to
reevaluate how content management offerings can play into their business model
and increase their overall profitability. The first step in this is identifying
the differences in the technology landscape, as well as the usage of these
devices in the modern work environment. These differences can be boiled down into three areas:
- Ergonomics and mechanics of sharing a centralized machine. (bottleneck issues)
- Technical limitations – compression, image issues, network traffic, and automated extraction
- Business compensation models don't allow for consultative sales, both in refining skill sets and in practice

This meant several things until
recently when it came to sharing these types of resources. Because printing
documents was largely used for external communications, it trumped the need to
scan to email. The official document needed to be printed, and so all of the
scans/ emails/etc. were conveniences but took lower priority than the business
requirement to print.
Scans were postponed while other MPF users were creating
(printing) the document to which you could affix your "Wet
signature". This high demand and
use for the copy machine meant that there were bottlenecks within organizations
The need to print trumped the need to
scan every time.
Now, e-communications, including secure email, mortgage documents,
and electronic communications in general are accepted as the de facto
standard of communicating for all but the most high-value transactions.
This is a key driver in allowing the MFP practical use as a production (though
more commonly ad hoc) device to support scanning operations.
In the next post, we will explore the
technical issues behind sharing the copying machine, and how they have changed,
and why these changes make a difference in the efficiency with which you can
scan.
No comments:
Post a Comment